2018 Bordeaux blog Bordeaux Bordeaux primeurs En Primeur Fine Wine Headlines News Pomerol primeurs St Emilion Wine

Bordeaux 2018: The Right Bank overview

18th April, 2019
Colin Hay

In my first article on Bordeaux 2018 I sought to capture a number of the complexity of a probably exceptional but heterogeneous classic outlined by climatic extremes. Within the second, my goal was to paint in a bit of extra element the character of the classic on the Left Bank. Right here I seek to do the identical for the Right Bank.

It’s troublesome if not unattainable to step off the practice in Bordeaux for the week of the en primeur tastings and not using a sure sense of anticipation, pleasure and expectation concerning the classic ahead and 2018 was no exception.

Expectations have been definitely high for an excellent, probably wonderful, classic, but one through which the wines of the Left Bank, and notably those grown on the cooler clay soils of the northern Médoc have been more likely to be probably the most fêted.

And there’s in fact a certain logic to this. For 2018 is a particularly scorching vintage – with 1,136 hours of daylight recorded in Pomerol between June and September (the very best within the 50 years through which data have been stored) and with average temperatures in August, September and October in St Emilion an entire 1.5 degrees above the typical.

Arriving at Bordeaux’s Gare Saint-Jean, then, the suspicion was of over-ripeness and extreme alcohol – briefly, a classic by which freshness and the cool soils of the northern Médoc have been more likely to be at a qualitative premium and by which high proportion Merlot cuvées may endure.

However like most such pre-judgements, while the logic may need been impeccable, the inferences drawn have been removed from solely correct. Above all, this isn’t a ‘Left Bank vintage’ any greater than it’s a ‘Right Bank vintage’.

And, as I explained in my previous article, it isn’t really a northern Médoc classic either – although a few of the greatest wines of the Left Bank undoubtedly come from St Estèphe and Pauillac.

But it is a classic by which alcohol ranges are a concern, during which freshness is the watchword and by which that freshness was all the time going to be harder to seek out in 100% Merlot cuvées. Briefly, 2018 is a yr by which even a bit of Right- Bank Cabernet Franc or Cabernet Sauvignon was all the time more likely to go a great distance.

So what sort of a vintage is it? And, above all, what sort of a classic is it in St Emilion and Pomerol? The brief, if perhaps irritating, answer to that question is ‘complex’.

2018 is definitely a classic by which one must be very careful in choosing what to buy – and undoubtedly more selective still among the many wines of the Right Bank.

However one of the best wines of the classic are pretty much evenly unfold between Left and Right, with a very high focus of them in Pomerol and on the argilo-calcaire plateau and côtes around the village of St Emilion itself.

As with the Left Bank, if we’re to paint an in depth picture of this complicated classic, it’s useful to start out with the info on common vineyard yields, by appellation.

Here they’re for St Emilion and Pomerol and, to assist with the comparison, I show also the typical figures for the 4 key Médoc appellations (St Estèphe, Pauillac, St Julien and Margaux).

2016 2017 2018 Average (2008-17)
St Emilion 46.2 21.7 39.7 38.2
Pomerol 44.four 23.9 36.2 37.5
Left Bank common 47.7 43.1 40.8 40.eight

Common vineyard yield by appellation (hl/ha)

Supply: calculated from @GavinQuinney, Duane/CIVB

The story here is, above all, considered one of aid. 2018 yields in St Emilion and Pomerol are, within the grand scheme of issues, nothing to get enthusiastic about – both simply above or just under the 10-year average (and with that average itself significantly lowered by exceptionally low yields in each 2017 and 2013).

But they are twice those achieved in the frost-ravaged 2017 vintage. After the anxieties of intense mildew strain in the late spring and early summer time, to get even close to common yields was exceptional. It massively exceeded expectations in June or July. That stated, in each St Emilion and Pomerol yields in 2018 are lower than for 2014, 2015 or 2016.

The elements concerned are, by now, acquainted.

A relatively late bud-burst, delayed by a cool begin to the yr and already water-logged soils, the truth is decreased the threat of hail and frost injury. However a steep rise in temperature in mid-April mixed with incessant rainfall led to optimum circumstances for the unfold of downy mildew. This significantly decreased potential yields in all but a handful of the airiest and most uncovered vineyards of St Emilion’s argilo-calcaire plateau and côtes.

Troplong-Mondot, arguably the windiest and positively the very best vineyard in St Emilion, saw primarily no mildew and achieved a powerful yield of 49 hl/ha.

30-35 hl/ha was more the norm among the main estates, and yields have been sometimes decrease still in Pomerol.

Furthermore, as on the Left Bank, the extra windy and uncovered vineyards, although extra shielded from the specter of mildew, have been additionally most vulnerable to yield loss in the lengthy scorching summer time via the focus and desiccation of the grapes on the vines in a very windy September.

The outcome was an optimally ripe crop of highly concentrated grapes with excessive potential alcohol picked à la carte and vinification tanks by which, in some instances, the ratio of juice to bodily matter (grape skins and pips) exceeded 50%.

St Emilion

Of the two leading Right Bank appellations, St Emilion is definitely the more heterogeneous in 2018. Certainly it’s by far probably the most uneven of the main appellations in the classic.

As already recommended, 100% Merlot vineyards and special cuvées are a difficult proposition in a classic like 2018 and lots of lack freshness, precision and definition. They’re typically uncomfortably sweet-tinged, their svelte tannins turning into virtually ‘soupy’ on the palate they usually end with just a bit an excessive amount of of a hint of alcoholic ‘heat’. They lack terroir specificity and style, in the long run, somewhat ‘samey’.

A few of these wines, in fact, come from the ‘usual suspects’. However the level is that many don’t – this is somewhat extra a characteristic of the vintage than it is a reflection of a specific fashion of wine-making (now very a lot in retreat anyway). There are exceptions (to which we’ll return), however they are relatively few and far between.

If vintages like this, marked by the long scorching summer time, are to turn out to be the norm one worries about the future of wines like this.

But when St Emilion has plenty of the vintage’s ‘lows’ in 2018, it also has greater than its justifiable share of the ‘highs’, if maybe no very obvious ‘wine of the vintage’.

Certainly, these highs symbolize a number of the most nice surprises of the week of the en primeur tastings.

Though it is, in fact, troublesome to generalise, they are typically characterised by a variety of elements.

The first of these is hardly shocking – the nature and quality of their terroir. Nevertheless, the complexities of this are fascinating. For, controversial though it’d nicely be to say so, not all the greatest terroirs of St Emilion for my part have been equally feted in 2018.

The nice estates have, in the long run, all made great wines. But those which most exceeded my expectations (some notable exceptions however) come from primarily the same argilo-calcaire terroir. Indeed, they come from a relatively slender band or strip operating from Troplong-Mondot, by way of Trottevieille and Villemaurine, via Les Grands Murailles and Clos Fourtet to Canon and on to Belair-Monange and Angelus.

I’m not saying that these are the St Emilion wines of the vintage (although a few of them are definitely contenders for that accolade). However I am suggesting that these wines – by advantage of their distinctive terroir and, above all, its capacity to protect towards hydric stress – are strikingly recent and moderately decrease in alcohol than lots of their peers. They’re pure, precise, racy and energetic in a approach that few wines in this classic are, and each one stands out on this classic.

A second issue, not in fact totally unrelated, is encépagement. Basically, vineyards with a better proportion of Cabernet Franc and/or Cabernet Sauvignon (and, in fact, the terroir and publicity to convey them to optimum ripeness) produced extra complicated, nuanced, energetic and thrilling wines in 2018. It’s troublesome to think about a St Emilion Grand Cru Classé with lower than 50% Merlot within the last mix that has not made a very nice wine on this classic. That is probably not much of a revelation but it is nonetheless essential to say so.

Lastly, and inevitably, vinification is crucial – much more so in a vintage of climatic extra. Sulphur-free fermentation; the fermentation of uncrushed berries; parcel and micro-parcel vinification; micro-vinification en barrique; cold pre-fermentation maceration; lowered temperature fermentation; and, basically, cautious extraction have been all a lot in evidence and, more considerably, each appears to have been rewarded in qualitative phrases.

This brings us to the wines themselves. Limits of area forestall a totally complete picture, so my goal as an alternative is to tug out a couple of highlights.

Let’s begin with the close to neighbours, Cheval Blanc and Figeac, on the gravel soils near the appellation boundary with Pomerol. These have so typically in recent times produced, between them, the potential wines of the appellation.

And, don’t get me fallacious, each has produced an excellent wine in 2018. However for me neither stands out in fairly the best way that Cheval Blanc did in 2015 and Figeac did in 2016.

Cheval Blanc (54% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Franc; 6% Cabernet Sauvignon) is deep, intense, elegant, cool and nicely focussed. Its recent cassis fruit is accompanied by the classic’s signature recent mint with engaging hints of nutmeg, cloves and pepper. Its rippling tannins build to a stunning crescendo on the long end. However at this stage it’s a little troublesome to penetrate and there’s only a hint of a hint of alcohol on the end that I don’t recall in earlier vintages.

Figeac (37% Merlot, 30% Cabernet Franc and 33% Cabernet Sauvignon) is definitely no much less impressive and, if anything, extra intense and highly effective nonetheless. This isn’t a wine that would have been made before the arrival of the affable and exceptionally gifted Frederic Faye. The tannins, particularly when one considers that Cabernet makes up almost two-thirds of the mix for this wine, are immensely mushy and seductive and the general impression is of a golden fist in a velvet glove.

Plenty of good decisions have been made right here within the short-term wine-making facility put in place while the brand new chai is constructed. The wine is recent and to have stored it to 14% alcohol is spectacular (recall, the 2016 was 13.9%). But, for me, this can be a fairly monolithic wine through which one has the slight impression of winemaking methods being deployed to counteract and compensate for the excesses of the vintage.

Three kilometres away, up the hill and again on the côtes of St Emilion, we discover an superior Ausone (60% Cabernet Franc; 40% Merlot). It’s large, it’s profound and fairly in contrast to any wine I have previously tasted from the property.

Ausone is usually just a little impenetrable en primeur and the traits of the vintage intensify that additional. It is a wine that jogs my memory of my mortality – earlier than it reaches its prime I will long since have shuffled off this mortal coil. Its texture is extraordinary; its depth seemingly limitless. Like most of the greatest wines of the classic its tannins are so gentle and its density and presence on the palate so considerable that it imparts an virtually anaesthetic high quality, leaving no discernible trace of tannin on the finish, just the lingering style of grape-skins. But at the similar time one is conscious about the heat of the summer time – we now have late season brambles, damsons and plums, however we also have chocolate ganache, mocha and a contact of liquorice. The finish is lengthy and sappy, however sweet and I can’t deliver myself to ask the alcohol degree.

Wanting down from its high perch above the village of St Emilion Troplong-Mondot (85% Merlot; 13% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Cabernet Franc) is a revelation – and, for me at the very least, one that’s simpler to understand at this formative stage.

With Aymeric de Gironde (previously of Pichon Baron and, most just lately, Cos d’Estournel) now at the helm, half method via the development of a totally new chai and cuvier and with plans to embark on an formidable programme of replanting linked to the acquisition of neighbouring Mondotte Bellisle and Clos Labarde, all is change here. But nothing has changed greater than the fashion of the winemaking. Although the brand new Troplong continues to be very much a piece in progress, the wine is already scarcely recognisable from its former self. This, for me, is probably the most improved property in St Emilion. The wine is a model of freshness, purity and precision. It is marked by a vibrant, clear, brilliant fruit – blueberries, brambles, blackberries and cherries – yet it’s also remarkably composed, elegant, silky and full on the palate. Freshness and a stunning minerality course by way of its veins, superbly revealed by the restrained winemaking.

Restraint and magnificence additionally characterise Clos Fourtet (90% Merlot; 7% Cabernet Sauvigon; three% Cabernet Franc) – though here the story is considered one of stylistic continuity. One notices instantly three issues – the gloriously ethereal texture, the linearity and minerality that is the signature of the limestone plateau and the recent virtually croquant (‘crunchy’) dark berry fruit – cassis and blackberries with a hint of all spice and only a touch of vanilla. This is not an enormous wine within the context of the classic, nevertheless it builds superbly on the palate and it is trendy and lengthy.

A revelation of a unique sort comes within the form of the neighbouring and tiny production Les Grands Murailles (100% Merlot) from the same secure. This is the very antithesis of what one expects a Merlot monocépage to supply in a vintage like 2018 and it virtually must be tasted to be believed. It’s lithe and tense, pure and refined, and it’s all about fruit and terroir expression. It is delicate (not a word discovered often in my tasting notes in this classic) and it is highly advisable.

Just a little additional along the plateau we come to Canon (72% Merlot; 28% Cabernet Franc). That is one other wine reworked in current vintages and its 2018 is each bit nearly as good as one would now anticipate it to be. It is refined and focussed with that pretty chalky minerality so outstanding additionally within the 2015.

It is pure, clear and recent and marked, like Clos Fourtet, by an virtually croquant high quality to the fruit. The tannins are of pure velvet and there’s a pretty cool refinement and magnificence. It isn’t particularly highly effective, but it is darkish, cool, quietly understated and very trendy. The alcohol, at 14%, is just not an element.

The newly-acquired neighbouring Berliquet (78% Merlot; 22% Cabernet Franc) is another work in progress. There’s vital replanting to return, however the signature of Canon is already current in this, the first full classic underneath Chanel’s ownership. This shall be a wine to observe in the years to return. At 14.5%, the alcohol is a bit of greater and positively extra apparent. The wine is rather less refined and somewhat extra plush and has a extra peppery signature. However it has a pleasant graphite minerality and an attractive dark cherry and blackberry fruit.

A possible, if maybe unlikely, candidate for the St Emilion wine of the classic is Belair-Monange (90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc). The 2018 is the primary wine from this property that I have tasted en primeur – and it is distinctive. Alongside Trotanoy, and each bit nearly as good, it was the end result of a really robust line-up at JP Moueix. It is radiant, shiny and energetic, yet deep, sensuous and very complicated – each aromatically and on the layered and remarkably refined long mid-palate. It has an alluring graphite-iron minerality that compliments superbly the cherry/cassis fruit, with little hints of the purest darkest chocolate. I wrestle to think about a more full or more complicated St Emilion in the classic.

Again on the opposite aspect of Troplong-Mondot in Saint-Christophe-des-Bardes we find the home of Vignobles Okay and the very gifted Jean-Christophe Meyrou (previously of Le Homosexual and La Violette) at La Tour St-Christophe (80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc). This uniquely lovely dry-stone terraced winery on an exceptional argilo-calcaire terroir has produced, as arguably it has since 2015, the most effective value wine of all the vintage. It is strikingly totally different from anything that I tasted in St Emilion. It’s cool on the palate, recent, precise, glossy and extra linear than I feel some other wine of the appellation in 2018. It has a stunning grainy limestone tannin that provides an exquisite depth to the very long and composed end. It is juicy, sappy, yet rich and it has a chic graphite minerality.

Though altogether totally different, and slightly more of a work in progress one suspects, Vignobles Okay’s extra lately acquired Bellefont-Belcier (70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon) can also be a wine to observe. This, too, comes from an exquisite sun-trap vineyard, an excellent part of which can also be on argilo-calcaire terroir.

However its character could be very totally different. Tasted side-by-side the distinction is beautiful. Where La Tour St Christophe is linear and exact, Bellefont-Belcier is bold and generous. It’s massive, wealthy and opulent – a sweeter wine with a stunning rolling fan-tail finish through which the freshness that one misses just a little on the entrance palate in lastly unleashed in a moderately dramatic crescendo. It is wonderful, perhaps extra attribute of the classic and very totally different from its stable-mate. There is a good argument to be made for both.

Just not far away is another sun-trap vineyard, Tertre Roteboeuf (80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc). This can be a perplexing wine that can only divide opinion. At 16.2% alcohol (sure, you learn that appropriately) it won’t be to everyone’s taste, and I’m not positive that it is actually to mine. That stated, I really like this wine in bottle and it isn’t unusual for it to be a full degree larger in alcohol than some other wine within the appellation.

But at 16.2% alcohol there’s nowhere to hide and arguably we cross over into one thing of a unique sort, with a style and fruit profile one associates more with port than St Emilion: dried plums and figs, walnuts and an array of candy spices. Remarkably, though, there’s freshness too and the tannins are extraordinarily polished. This can be a wine to retaste. For now I reserve judgement.

Lastly, we come to 2 wines, each unique in its own means, that attain new qualitative heights in 2018. The first is Quinault L’Enclos (71.5% Merlot; 14.5% Cabernet Franc; 14% Cabernet Sauvignon), made by the staff liable for Cheval Blanc in a totally renovated winemaking facility permitting, for the first time, parcel and micro-parcel vinification. There has been a big programme of replanting right here, with the nonetheless comparatively just lately planted Cabernet Sauvignon adding in every consecutive classic extra to the structure and layered complexity of the wine. Although it has the misfortune, in effect, of getting to be tasted alongside Le Petit Cheval and Cheval Blanc, it all the time impresses – and the 2018 is the most effective wine I’ve tasted from this property. Its pure cassis and earthy, cedary notes strike a powerful chord.

And last, but definitely not least, we’ve got Jacques Thienpont’s tiny manufacturing L’If (74% Merlot; 26% Cabernet Franc). That is the 8th vintage of this wine from a small parcel adjoining Troplong Mondot – and it is certainly the perfect. It’s, quite merely, ethereal, with fantastically elegant tannins and a gloriously lithe texture and a tense and energetic end. It sits very comfortably now alongside it slightly more celebrated stablemate, Le Pin and that is some achievement.


If St Emilion in 2018 is an appellation of qualitative highs and lows, Pomerol is far, rather more constant. Certainly, if there’s an appellation of the vintage it is, for me, Pomerol. That isn’t what I anticipated once I stepped off the TGV at Gare St-Jean at the beginning of the week of primeur tastings.

There’s scarcely a single disappointment in the wines that I tasted – at all ranges and at all potential worth points. Furthermore, in a vintage through which delicate terroir traits and traits have something of a bent to be lost in a sea of opulence and alcohol, Pomerol stands out. Right here, eventually, no two wines taste the identical. The 2018s are, above all, a research in the vary and diversity of the fruit profiles of the main estates. It is maybe then not shocking that lots of my wines of the classic come from the appellation.

At the prime of the pile for me is Lafleur (50% Merlot; 50% Cabernet Franc). It is as close as en primeur gets to perfection and an exquisite reward for the appreciable funding made within the chai and cuvier during the last two years.

It is, as perfection tends to be, harder to capture in words than some other en primeur sample I’ve ever tasted and the try to do so brings back the tear to the nook of my eye that expressed on the time the emotional influence of this extraordinary wine. It is a veritable plunge pool of cool dark fruit. It is succulent, it’s profound, it is supremely pure and balanced yet energetic and shiny and its end seems eternal – I can virtually taste it now.

And, each Les Pensées de Lafleur and Les Perrières de Lafleur (from the limestone terroir of Fronsac planted with massal clones from Lafleur itself) are remarkably close in qualitative terms to the top that is the first wine. They clearly come from the identical DNA.

Virtually as impressive, however so very totally different in type and character is neighbouring Evangile (80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc). After dropping all of their Cabernet Franc to frost in 2017, Evangile is again on prime type with a really full, exciting and exuberant wine. There’s nothing sombre about this; however it is gloriously opulent.

The fruit is profound – succulent black cherries and plums with a contact of chocolate – and there are fantastic floral notes – rose petals, peonies and violets. This can be a somewhat sweeter and creamier wine than Lafleur, however it works fantastically properly. It’s breathtaking.

And in Blason de L’Evangile, they have made, alongside Les Pensées, arguably the Right Bank’s second wine of the vintage.

Just alongside the road we come to La Conseillante (83% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Franc). This, too, is superb and very true to what’s now a well-established, if still evolving, home fashion. That is limpid in the glass with a lovely purple ‘robe’ – one can virtually see the signature blueberries. On the palate, the fruit – cassis and blueberries (in fact) – is recent and accompanied by an attractive graphite minerality and notes of violets.

This is, because it all the time is, a really precise and focussed wine, but it is greater, fuller and richer than standard. Many will actually like that. But for me the density of this wine truly leads it to lose only a contact of its attribute delicacy. If Evangile absolutely embraces and is flattered by the opulence of 2018, La Conseillante appears just a little extra thrown by it.

The similar cannot be stated for Vieux Château Certan (70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc). That is one other potential wine of the classic, stylistically someplace between Evangile and La Conseillante. It’s cool and composed and has pretty compact, dense filigree tannins. The nose and palate and splendidly complicated – with recent raspberries and a compote of purple berry fruit accompanied by violets, verbena, freesias and even camomile and menthol. It’s superbly poised, elegant, balanced and energetic with out being in any method boisterous or brash.

On the other aspect of, and equidistant from, l’Eglise de Pomerol we come to Denis Durantou’s fantastic L’Eglise Clinet (90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc). If Evangile is Catholic Pomerol then this is Protestant Pomerol; and it’s just nearly as good, if very, very totally different. Right here once more we find recent pure darkish berry fruit, brambles and cherries (purple in addition to black) and a contact of mint. There’s nice pressure on this wine and a wealthy iron minerality. It is leaner and extra precise and layered than Evangile and it is sombre and critical the place Evangile is youthful and exuberant. They’re wines to be drunk together.

Again in the direction of Lafleur, we come to Vignobles Péré-Vergé at Le Homosexual (90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc). Right here the type is completely totally different but once more – a product of micro-vinification in new oak barrels. This produces, notably in 2018, probably the most exceptional velvet texture. Le Gay itself is pure silk. Blueberries with notes of chocolate and mocha wrapped in probably the most alluring gown of tannic velour.

However that isn’t all. For La Violette (100% Merlot), with the individual grapes plucked by hand from every bunch before the identical micro-vinification in barrel, takes this to another degree altogether. In 2018 this produces a wine that is, in a approach, the pure essence of Pomerol – an unimaginable textural sensation of cashmere-wrapped black cherry fruit.

It’s chic and, in 2018 greater than some other earlier vintage I’ve tasted, this serves to enlarge, intensify and intensify the terroir notes. In its own very distinct means, that is one other probably good wine.

For those of us who can’t afford both Le Gay or La Violette, there’s good news too. For Montviel (80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc), again using 100% micro-vinification, takes one remarkably near attaining the identical textural effect. They produced no 2017 but the 2018 is, by far, the perfect wine I’ve ever tasted from right here and it is extremely advisable.

The superlatives continue at Jacques Thienpont’s chic micro-cuvée Le Pin (100% Merlot). This, too, is a unprecedented wine and it is a privilege to have the prospect to taste it – in Jacques Thienpont’s front room no much less! Once once more we’re within the realm of gossamer tannins. This can be a remarkably exact, pure, linear wine. Yet, at the similar time, it has that cool, slightly sombre deep magnificence and quiet depth that marks out the really great wines on this classic. The texture is elegant; the end appears countless; and one is left with no hint of alcohol or tannin, just the lingering style of grape-skins.

Lastly, we come to the in depth Pomerol vary of JP Moueix in Libourne. Right here one tastes by means of 10 totally different wines from totally different elements of the appellation. Every was, in its own distinct method, wonderful.

However what was instantly putting was that the wines with greater proportions of Cabernet Franc and even Cabernet Sauvignon have been brisker, most distinctive and more vigorous – Plince (79% Merlot; 21% Cabernet Franc); La Grave (85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc); Bourgneuf (80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc) and, above all, Certan de Might (70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon) all stood out.

But amongst their very prime wines, three in Pomerol notably excelled. Hosanna (70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc), on blue clay and graves terroir, is cool, plush and exotic with engaging graphite and cedar notes and, clearly, an excellent future forward of it.

La Fleur Pétrus (91% Merlot; 6% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot) is darker, richer, a bit firmer however with a really totally different fruit profile – more raspberries and brambles and a peppery spicy finish which, presumably, comes for the Petit Verdot. It is extremely distinctive and very elegant.

And eventually, in Trotanoy (90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc) we’ve got an extra contender for wine of the classic. That is sombre and suave, pure and deep with intensely darkish, velvety berry and cherry fruit. It is cool and svelte and like diving by means of crystal clear water.

It is, like so most of the greatest wines from Pomerol in this classic, completely superb.

Colin Hay is Professor of Political Science at Sciences Po in Paris the place he works on the political financial system of los angeles place de Bordeaux and wine markets more usually. His Bordeaux 2018 protection will continue with two further pieces on Pessac-Léognon and, lastly, a summary piece on the ‘wines of the vintage’ within the coming weeks.